Analytic Number Theory

Complex analysis applied to prime distribution and L-functions.


foundation tier

Analytic Number Theory. Complex analysis applied to prime distribution and L-functions.

Foundations and canonical references

The standard treatments of analytic number theory approach the subject from complementary angles. Davenport, Multiplicative Number Theory (2000) is the anchor reference for the subject and lays out the core definitions, theorems, and worked examples that practitioners return to. Iwaniec, Analytic Number Theory (2004) gives a parallel, more proof-oriented exposition of the same material and is widely used as a graduate text.

Open methodological questions for analytic number theory include sharpening the bridges between foundational theory and computational practice, extending classical results to broader or more structured settings, and integrating the techniques surveyed above with adjacent mathematical disciplines. The references listed in this page are the entry points that current work builds on.

Prerequisites

Sources

  • textbook · primary · 2000
    Multiplicative Number Theory
    davenport-2000
  • textbook · primary · 2004
    Analytic Number Theory
    iwaniec-2004, kowalski-2004

In context

Where this topic sits in the prerequisite graph. Click any node to jump.

Open in full atlas →

Explore

  1. 01

    Riemann Zeta Function

    Analytic continuation, functional equation, and zero-free regions.

  2. 02

    Prime Distribution

    Prime number theorem, sieve methods, and gaps between primes.

  3. 03

    Sieve Methods

    Brun, Selberg, and large sieves; bounded gaps.

  4. 04

    L-Functions

    Dirichlet L-functions, automorphic L-functions, and the Selberg class.

  5. 05

    Exponential Sums

    Weyl, Vinogradov, and bounds via Bombieri–Iwaniec.

  6. 06

    Multiplicative Functions and the Anatomy of Integers

    Erdős–Kac, Granville–Soundararajan pretentiousness.


Review this topic

This page was drafted by an agent and is waiting on expert review. Spotted a wrong prerequisite, a missing concept, a misattributed source, or a factual slip? Tell us — your review opens a tracked issue maintainers act on.