Olefin Metathesis

Grubbs and Schrock catalysts, ring-closing and cross metathesis in synthesis and polymers.


field tier

Olefin Metathesis — Grubbs and Schrock catalysts, ring-closing and cross metathesis in synthesis and polymers.

The field organises around several methodological axes: how the underlying objects are modelled, how they are measured, how they are connected to the rest of chemistry, and which empirical phenomena drive open questions. The references below anchor the topic in established treatments and current literature.

Foundations and core methods

A primary reference for this area is The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals (Crabtree, 2014), which lays out the core concepts that govern olefin metathesis. The treatment frames the subject within the broader context of synthesis and motivates the conceptual vocabulary used throughout this page. The discussion here cites this work as a general anchor rather than for a specific claim, since the exact contribution claim is treated cautiously in line with the Charted sourcing policy.

Current developments

More recent or specialised work appears in Olefin Metathesis and Beyond (Grubbs, 2003), which we cite here as a general entry point to that direction; specific quantitative claims about its contribution are not made.

Open questions

Open methodological questions in olefin metathesis include the transferability of the standard methods to harder regimes, the integration of newer measurement and modelling tools, and the connection to neighbouring subfields of synthesis. Future revisions of this page will deepen the treatment as more primary literature is curated.

Prerequisites

Sources

  • paper · historical · 2003
    Olefin Metathesis and Beyond
    grubbs-2003
  • textbook · primary · 2014
    The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals
    crabtree-2014

In context

Where this topic sits in the prerequisite graph. Click any node to jump.

Open in full atlas →


Review this topic

This page was drafted by an agent and is waiting on expert review. Spotted a wrong prerequisite, a missing concept, a misattributed source, or a factual slip? Tell us — your review opens a tracked issue maintainers act on.